
"Does decentralized delivery save you money" doesn't have one answer, because "compared to what" changes the answer completely. AIOZ Stream's delivery rate is a flat $0.02 per GB. Whether that's cheaper depends entirely on which alternative you're pricing it against and how much you're actually delivering, and the honest comparison looks different for almost every CDN you'd consider switching from.
TL;DR:
The published rate is $0.02 per GB delivered, flat, billed from the same AIOZ token wallet as storage and transcoding. No tier to qualify for, no minimum commitment, no negotiation.
AWS's own published CloudFront data transfer pricing for the US, Canada, Mexico, and Europe starts at $0.085 per GB for the first 10TB a month (after a 1TB free allowance), then steps down as volume grows: $0.080/GB for the next 40TB, $0.060/GB for the next 100TB, $0.040/GB for the next 350TB, and further reductions after that, eventually reaching $0.02/GB only above roughly 5 petabytes a month. At every tier below multi-petabyte scale, which covers nearly every business that isn't already one of the largest streaming platforms in the world, AWS's list price is higher than AIOZ Stream's flat $0.02/GB, in some cases by more than 4x.
This is the comparison that doesn't reduce to a single number. Cloudflare doesn't meter bandwidth on its Free, Pro, or Business plans for standard cacheable HTTP delivery; it's bundled into a flat monthly plan fee instead of billed per GB. That means for straightforward video delivery through Cloudflare's core CDN, "cost per gigabyte" isn't really the axis to compare on, because Cloudflare isn't charging on that axis in the first place. Where per-GB billing does show up on Cloudflare is in adjacent metered products, like Argo Smart Routing at $0.10 per GB, which solves a different problem (route optimization) than raw delivery volume.
At 5TB (5,000GB) delivered in a month: AIOZ Stream comes to $100. AWS CloudFront's list price, after the 1TB free allowance, spends the rest in the $0.085/GB tier and comes to about $340, roughly 3.4x AIOZ's rate. At 50TB a month, AIOZ Stream is $1,000. AWS's list price crosses through the $0.085, $0.080, and $0.060 tiers on the way there and lands around $3,970, roughly 4x AIOZ's rate. The gap doesn't close as volume grows, at least not until you're well past what AWS's own tier table covers in a single step; it takes multiple petabytes a month before AWS's list price gets back down near AIOZ's flat rate.
None of this applies to Cloudflare's core CDN plans the same way, since that bandwidth isn't metered per GB to begin with, which is exactly why the two comparisons in this article have to stay separate instead of collapsing into one universal number.
If your current setup is metered CDN egress at anything resembling AWS's list price, AIOZ Stream's flat $0.02/GB is very likely cheaper, and the gap is largest for smaller and mid-sized accounts paying the highest per-GB tiers. If your current setup is Cloudflare's bundled-bandwidth core CDN, the savings argument doesn't really apply, because you're not being charged per GB to begin with; the case for switching there is about what else the same network gives you (storage and compute on the same account, not a separate CDN relationship), not a lower delivery bill. And if you're already a large enough customer to have negotiated a custom AWS or Cloudflare enterprise contract, nobody outside that negotiation knows your actual rate, so the honest move is to compare AIOZ's published $0.02/GB against your own invoice, not against a list price neither of you is actually paying.
Is AIOZ Stream always cheaper than a traditional CDN for delivery?
No. It's cheaper than AWS CloudFront's published list price at almost every realistic volume, but Cloudflare's core CDN plans don't meter bandwidth per GB at all, so that comparison isn't about price per gigabyte in the same way.
At what point does AWS CloudFront's price catch up to AIOZ Stream's?
Only at very high volume, roughly above a petabyte a month, where AWS's tiered discounts bring the list price down near $0.02-0.03/GB. Below that, AIOZ Stream's flat rate is cheaper.
Does Cloudflare really not charge for bandwidth at all?
Not for standard cacheable HTTP delivery on its Free, Pro, and Business plans; that bandwidth is bundled into the flat plan fee. Other Cloudflare products, like Argo Smart Routing, do bill per GB.
Are these AWS and Cloudflare numbers what large enterprise customers actually pay?
No. These are published list prices. Large customers regularly negotiate custom rates that aren't public, so a real comparison for an enterprise account should use that account's actual invoice, not the list price.
If delivery is cheaper, does that mean the whole bill is cheaper?
Not necessarily on its own. Delivery is one line item; the full cost breakdown also covers storage and transcoding, which have their own separate comparisons.

AIOZ Stream's flat $0.02/GB beats AWS CloudFront's list price at nearly every realistic scale, but Cloudflare does not meter bandwidth the same way at all.

AIOZ Stream publishes flat rates for storage, delivery, and transcoding, billed from one token wallet. Here is the full rate card and how billing works.

Standard HLS scales through any CDN but takes 20-45 seconds of latency; WebRTC gets under a second but does not scale past a few hundred viewers easily.

A DePIN replaces centralized data centers with independent node operators paid in tokens. Here is exactly how AIOZ Stream defines and runs its own network.

AIOZ Stream publishes a flat transcoding rate with no volume tiers. Here is how it actually compares to AWS MediaConvert and Google Cloud Transcoder prices.

A walk through what actually happens between ingest and playback on AIOZ Stream: transcoding, adaptive bitrate, decentralized storage, and quality monitoring.